[LITMUS^RT] Building tools/perf under LITMUS^RT

[Björn Brandenburg]

On Apr 18, 2012, at 5:04 AM, Christopher Kenna wrote:

> 
> I'd like to permanently fix this because I am using performance monitoring for work on caching. Do you think the ugly relative include is a good fix, or would you a modification to the tools/perf Makefile be more appropriate? My rationale for not touching tools/perf/Makefile is that I don't want to change a utility that is "external" to LITMUS and the kernel. That would just be one more Makefile to worry about in the future.
> 


Hi Chris,

I think the appropriate fix is to patch the perf Makefile. We can carry such a fix forward when rebasing.

Thanks,
Björn