[LITMUS^RT] Question about the scheduling overhead of GSN-EDF scheduler in LITMUS
Meng Xu
xumengpanda at gmail.com
Tue Oct 13 15:40:27 CEST 2015
Hi Bjorn,
2015-10-13 4:54 GMT-04:00 Björn Brandenburg <bbb at mpi-sws.org>:
>
> > On 11 Oct 2015, at 16:57, Meng Xu <xumengpanda at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I actually have one question about this:
> > Why the background cache-intensive task will affect the scheduling
> overhead?
> > Is it because the ready_queue data may be polluted by the background
> tasks so that it will take longer time to take one task from ready_queue
> and therefore increases the critical section?
> > I'm not sure if there is any other reason why the background tasks can
> increase the scheduling overhead.
>
> Hi Meng,
>
> by running a cache-thrashing background workload, the cost of a memory
> accesses increases significantly. Basically, the rate of cache misses
> increases (scheduler data structures are more likely to be evicted between
> invocations of the scheduler) and any cache miss becomes much more
> expensive (because the memory controller is under heavy load). Basically,
> to approximate near-worst-case performance, you need to create lots of
> potential for interference at all shared hardware resources.
>
Thank you so much for your help and time in answering these questions!
They are really helpful!
Best regards,
Meng
-----------
Meng Xu
PhD Student in Computer and Information Science
University of Pennsylvania
http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~mengxu/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.litmus-rt.org/pipermail/litmus-dev/attachments/20151013/30c4d018/attachment.html>
More information about the litmus-dev
mailing list